Requiem for a backhand.

Watch the tennis. Tonight in New York, a forty-one-year-old walked onto a court he was not supposed to be on. Two weeks ago the US Open told Stan Wawrinka there was no wild card for him. No place, at the tournament he won, for the farewell he had planned. He flew home to Switzerland and let himself believe it was over. Then another player's body broke, a phone rang in the mountains, and a man ranked 125th in the world got on a plane back to New York to play Matteo Berrettini in the first round of the last Grand Slam of his life. He carried a racquet, a Beckett quotation and a shot the game has decided to stop making.

This is a requiem for the one-handed backhand. But it is really a study of something we keep finding everywhere we look: how a system deletes a character.

· · ·

Read the two backhands the way you would read a person, not by the mechanics but by the character they project. The two-handed backhand is the Ally of strokes. Not impressive. Reliable. It is compact, stable, repeatable at scale. It returns the 130-mile-an-hour serve without flinching and absorbs the heavy topspin ball at the shoulder. It is the loyal sidekick that makes the forehand's heroism possible. It is what every academy coaches into every junior. It is the selected thing. Selection does not buy character. It buys predictability, and it is usually right to.

The one-hander is not selected. It is chosen, almost always against advice, usually by a child who saw one once and could not look away. It takes longer to learn. It breaks down on the return. It gets attacked high, all day, by anyone with a scouting report. What it gives back is reach, disguise, a slice that lives in the same hand and the single most beautiful ball flight in the sport. On paper the trade is bad. The paper cannot hold what the shot carries. Nobody is assigned this stroke. You have to appoint yourself. The two-hander is a hire. The one-hander is a founding.

· · ·

Watch what fifty years of selection does to an unselected character. When the rankings began in 1973, virtually every man in the top ten hit his backhand with one hand. Connors and Borg were the famous exceptions, the strange ones. By the end of 2003 the one-handers were seven of the top twenty. By 2013 they were sixty-two of the top three hundred. In 2024 they were eleven of the top hundred, and for six weeks that winter the top ten held none at all, the first time in the half-century history of the rankings. This morning, the day Wawrinka played what may be his last major, there were four one-handed backhands in the top hundred of men's tennis. Four. The best of them was ranked fourteenth. The top ten held zero. And if no one-hander reaches the semifinals of this US Open, 2026 will be the first season without a one-handed Grand Slam semifinalist since the first Wimbledon was played in 1877.

None of this is a conspiracy, and that is the point. The modern game punishes exactly what the one-hander is. The big serve attacks its longer take-back. Fifty years of string technology aim heavy topspin at its one shoulder. The environment selects, the academies comply, and a character quietly stops being made. It happens anywhere a system does the choosing. Tennis is just the one place you can watch it happen in public, in real time, to something beautiful.

· · ·

There is a character selection never produces, because his virtue only becomes visible after failure, and selection exists to avoid failure in advance. Call him the Gladiator. Not the biggest hitter. Not the natural, not the anointed. The one whose truest fight is against his own weakness, whose only real enemy is quitting, who wins by getting back up.

Stan Wawrinka is the Gladiator, and he carries the stroke to match. Three major titles. To win them he went through the greatest players who ever lived, at the height of their powers. Djokovic twice in finals. Nadal once. He won three of his four major finals and lost everything else often enough that nobody ever called him reliable. His trophies were not accumulated. They were seized, on single afternoons when the backhand caught fire and the best defenders in history could only watch it go past. On his left forearm, the words he plays by:

"Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better."

— Samuel Beckett

Selected out, then readmitted by accident, still swinging at forty-one. The Gladiator does not get invited. He shows up anyway.

· · ·

If you watched tonight, you saw it. On the dead run, from positions where every two-hander on tour must chip the ball back and pray, a one-hand player can still rip a full passing shot. The reach is unfakeable. It happens maybe ten times a match. The other sixty backhands are why the stroke is dying. Those ten are why grown adults gasp at a tennis shot. A selected system optimizes the sixty. A chosen character lives for the ten.

Stan is nobody's idea of an Idol. He looks like a local bowling champion. He won Roland Garros in shorts the internet has never forgiven. And he hits the prettiest shot in tennis. He uncoils that backhand down the line, and for one second he is the most beautiful thing in sport. That is the Idol's real secret. Beauty was never the person. Beauty is the moment a person disappears into the thing they do.

And it is tennis's oldest secret too. This game has always been two characters in one body. The Gladiator's sport: single combat, no team, no clock, nowhere to hide. The Idol's sport: played in white at cathedrals, the only game that keeps score in love. Combat that insists on being beautiful. The one-handed backhand was the purest expression of the marriage, the Gladiator's weapon swung the Idol's way. And the Idol's sworn enemy is decay. Of course this stroke got a requiem.

Be clear about what this requiem is not. It is not a claim that the one-hander is better. Fifty years of evidence say it is not, and the evidence has won. It is a claim about what a system loses when it optimizes: variance, beauty and the visible act of choosing. The one-hander was legible character. You knew something true about Federer, about Stan, about anyone who kept it, before they spoke a word, because you were looking at a decision, made young and defended for a lifetime against every incentive to conform. When every backhand is the same backhand, the stroke stops telling you who is holding the racquet. Sameness is efficient. It is also silent.

The stroke will not come back. The ladder only runs down. But you already know this was never only about tennis. Whatever your world selects for is your two-hander, and it is winning for a reason. The question worth carrying out of Flushing Meadows tonight is what your one-hander is. The thing no one would ever select you into, the thing you would have to appoint yourself to carry, then pay for, daily, in public. The game will tell you it is inefficient. The game is right.

Carry it anyway. Fail better.

· · ·

Postscript, later that night. He lost. The farewell ended in the first round, which the record will file as a defeat, and the record, as usual, cannot hold the thing that happened. A man who was told there was no place for him played the last Grand Slam match of his life anyway. The requiem was never waiting on the result. The Gladiator's virtue only shows after failure, and he gave the sport one more. Somewhere tonight a kid saw that backhand uncoil down the line once and could not look away. That is how this stroke has always recruited. Fail better.

Coda. An essay from Signal Labs. We read people, brands and, it turns out, backhands by the character they project. The counts are public record: Tennis Abstract's one-hand backhand report of 31 August 2026 (four in the ATP top 100: Musetti at No. 14, Shapovalov, Tsitsipas and Altmaier, with none in the top ten); seven one-handers in the year-end 2003 top 20; sixty-two in the April 2013 top 300; eleven in the top 100 in 2024, the year the top ten first held zero in the rankings' five-decade history. Wawrinka's wild-card refusal and recall, and his first-round match against Berrettini on 31 August 2026, are as reported this week.

Signal Labs · signallabs.ca · The Behaviour Code

The instrument behind the essays, live, and free.